Richard Widmann of the CODOH WWII revisionist organization alerted us to the existence of a very exclusive listing of "hate" sites here on the Web, which is maintained by the Harvard Law Library. Oddly enough, not a single hateful Zionist website is listed by the Harvard law school archivist who maintains the site, intended to serve as a bastion of permanent stigma whereby "news organizations" may peruse a list of "demonic websites" and then proceed to ruin the good names and reputations of those who edit and master them. In other nations this would be termed libel, but here in the U.S., with its weak libel provisions and civil courts open only to the plutocrat and mandarin classes (thanks to the licensing of lawyers required by lawyer-run cartels masquerading as state legislatures), the poor and the politically marginal thus libeled, are expected to suffer with the proper humility and deference to their Harvard monarch.
Well around these parts we will have no king but Jesus, so we contacted the Harvard Law school library and the absurdity, born of an impossibly traumatized sensibility, known as the "Harvard Hate Guide." We questioned their politicization of this nifty little label of "hater," so handy for separating a man from his humanity and credibility; the better to pass comprehensive, Talmudic "hate" laws regulating who can say what and when, just as the Talmud itself minutely regulates the behavior of those who are enslaved to it, 24 hours a day, down to the most mundane and intimate details of human living.
Of course the partisans of the notion that the German people, circa 1940, were a race of genocidal monsters, that is to say, the fans and advocates of Prof. Daniel Goldhagen and his hefty hate-tome,Willing Executioners, are not listed on the Harvard inventory of hateful websites. Groups such as the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which derive a lucrative income advocating anti-German racism and who are among the most energetic promoters of Goldhagen's hate, are the colleagues--not the targets--of the Harvard law library's "Guide to Hate."
If we penetrate the clever "human rights" facade whereby hidden political agendas are advanced, we discover that the Harvard Law school project is intended as a tool for self-aggrandizement. Just as there is no such thing as an Israeli war criminal, neither can there be a Jewish hate group online. Voila, all such groups are omitted from the Harvard law library list.
On the other hand, Bradley R. Smith's academic, CODOH revisionist site is listed as a "hate group" by Harvard Law. Do we perhaps glimpse here the heavy hand of one Alan Dershowitz, Harvard professor of law and windy exponent of chutzpah?
Mr. Dershowitz once proclaimed in public, to the media, that Bradley R.Smith of CODOH was a "known anti-Black racist."
Where did this "giant" of a lawyer, whose word is consulted at every turn by his admirers in the corporate media, obtain his documentation for this serious charge?
Why, he made it up, of course, out of thin air, perhaps confident that no establishment reporter, out of any sense of justice for Mr. Smith, would dare to ask the "great professor" for something so trivial as documentation. It was enough that Mr. Dershowitz pronounced the fiat and soon it became "reality," to be copied into the files of the Southern "Poverty Palace" Law Center, the A.D.L., the Wiesenthal Center and the lesser spy shops, police fronts and Big Brother thought police who operate under cover of the media euphemism, "Watch Dog" groups.
The fact that Bradley Smith is well known in the revisionist community as an anti-racist, quondam beatnik with a Mexican wife and family, is not a factor in Harvard Law professor Dershowitz's libel. Mr. Dershowitz is offended by Smith's skepticism toward the claim of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. Therefore, through the magic prism of chauvinistic antagonism, Mr. Smith becomes a target for whatever lie anyone in power wants to pin on him.
What is most laughable about this hatred toward revisionists and the demonization of marginal and heretical researchers and political activists, is that it emanates from Harvard, world capital of the campaign for "inclusiveness," and "civility in discourse" and "diversity" and other meanderings from a horse's ass.
I electronically mailed the Harvard Law School archive at their electronic Hate Sheet and congratulated them on their chutzpah in not having a single Jewish hate group listed in their supposed comprehensive, "objective and dispassionate" list. It is quite a cunning political coup for Zionism and the enforcement of official history and deserving of an accolade for its Machiavellian savy.
In case they were interested, I nominated the website of the Jewish Defense League (JDL) for inclusion in their list. The JDL has been linked to several terror bombings and labeled as terrorist by the FBI. Surely if pencil-pusher Bradley Smith's CODOH site qualifies as a "hate web," loaded as it is with megabytes worth of inflammable documents and books, quite possibly the terrorist JDL might pass muster as a hate group at the Harvard Law Library.
Not a chance! Here's the e-mail I received in return:
Subject: Re: Congratulations! Not one Jewish hate group listed! Date: Mon, 07 Oct 1996 12:15:23 +0000 From: lawlib@hulaw1.harvard.edu To: hoffman@rand.nidlink.com Thank you for your comments Mr. Hoffman. If you wish to submit a url of a Jewish Hate Group we will consider its inclusion. We have already evaluated the Jewish Defense League site and have chosen not to include it in our guide. Please email us with further suggestions
The Editor
If the "Harvard Hate Guide" has cleared the JDL of "hatefulness," the only way they'll include a Jewish site in their list, is if Baruch Goldstein were to rise from the grave and establish a web dedicated to killing 40 more Palestinians (not "29" as the media say), otherwise, don't hold your breath.
I will not engage in the futile charade of submitting any more Zionist hate sites to "The Editor," at Harvard, though there are plenty of them. What is needed is for a truly non-partisan group to establish some such study of "hate" on the web that would be non-propagandistic in its function. Failing that, perhaps we will inventory some of the genuine hate sites ourselves, in the future.
--Michael A. Hoffman II